Spark X2.6 4B vs Underdog Saluki 27B

Overall
15
vs
Overall
33

Underdog Saluki 27B is clearly better. It wins 46 of the 53 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Spark X2.6 4B spends 1.2× as many thinking tokens per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
151m 3s
8.2K, 84% thinking6.9K, 84% thinking
335m 15s
Agents
141m 32s
11.5K, 97% thinking11.8K, 97% thinking
409m 2s
Structured Extraction
1039.5s
5.3K, 78% thinking4.4K, 92% thinking
433m 17s
Coding
41m 8s
9.1K, 48% thinking9.2K, 49% thinking
166m 54s
Grounded Answers
1050.2s
6.6K, 86% thinking4.5K, 92% thinking
433m 22s
Instruction Following
371m 29s
11.9K, 90% thinking8K, 94% thinking
466m 5s
Business Logic
1036.3s
4.9K, 86% thinking5.2K, 81% thinking
333m 55s
Security & permissions
3154.3s
7K, 94% thinking4.9K, 91% thinking
433m 47s
Diagnosis & investigation
01m 30s
11.6K, 98% thinking8.7K, 94% thinking
06m 39s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
136 tok/s
23 tok/s
Machine
RTX 5090, 32 GB
Apple M5 Pro, 48 GB
Memory at 32K
9.4 GB (better)
10.2 GB
Context
605K (better)
256K
Cost per run
$1.61 est.
Not measured
Cost per case
$0.011 est.
Not measured
Time per case
1m 3s (better)
5m 15s
Quantization
BF16
IQ2_XS
Harness
llama.cpp
llama.cpp

The race

No lead changes

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

Spark X2.6 4BUnderdog Saluki 27B
0255075100501001501533

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

7 won by Spark X2.6 4B46 won by Underdog Saluki 27B100 tied