Spark X2.6 4B vs Underdog Saluki 27B
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Spark X2.6 4B spends 1.2× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskASpark X2.6 4BBUnderdog Saluki 27B
Overall
151m 3s
335m 15s
Agents
141m 32s
409m 2s
Structured Extraction
1039.5s
433m 17s
Coding
41m 8s
166m 54s
Grounded Answers
1050.2s
433m 22s
Instruction Following
371m 29s
466m 5s
Business Logic
1036.3s
333m 55s
Security & permissions
3154.3s
433m 47s
Diagnosis & investigation
01m 30s
06m 39s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecASpark X2.6 4BBUnderdog Saluki 27B
Speed
136 tok/s
23 tok/s
Machine
RTX 5090, 32 GB
Apple M5 Pro, 48 GB
Memory at 32K
9.4 GB (better)
10.2 GB
Context
605K (better)
256K
Cost per run
$1.61 est.
Not measured
Cost per case
$0.011 est.
Not measured
Time per case
1m 3s (better)
5m 15s
Quantization
BF16
IQ2_XS
Harness
llama.cpp
llama.cpp
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation