MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Spark X2.6 4B
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Spark X2.6 4B spends 1.8× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskAMiMo-V2.6-FlashBSpark X2.6 4B
Overall
451m 21s
151m 3s
Agents
381m 19s
141m 32s
Structured Extraction
6238.0s
1039.5s
Coding
242m 40s
41m 8s
Grounded Answers
6242.1s
1050.2s
Instruction Following
641m 2s
371m 29s
Business Logic
4356.4s
1036.3s
Security & permissions
662m 6s
3154.3s
Diagnosis & investigation
01m 33s
01m 30s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecAMiMo-V2.6-FlashBSpark X2.6 4B
Speed
66 tok/s
136 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
RTX 5090, 32 GB
Memory at 32K
—
9.4 GB
Context
1.1M (better)
605K
Cost per run
$0.33 (better)
$1.61 est.
Cost per case
$0.0021 (better)
$0.011 est.
Time per case
1m 21s
1m 3s (better)
Quantization
BF16
BF16
Harness
openrouter
llama.cpp
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation