Mellum2.1 Thinking vs Spark X2.6 4B
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Both models spend about the same on thinking per test case.
TaskAMellum2.1 ThinkingBSpark X2.6 4B
Overall
91m 56s
151m 3s
Agents
92m 3s
141m 32s
Structured Extraction
51m 36s
1039.5s
Coding
52m 11s
41m 8s
Grounded Answers
131m 24s
1050.2s
Instruction Following
283m 10s
371m 29s
Business Logic
01m 39s
1036.3s
Security & permissions
81m 40s
3154.3s
Diagnosis & investigation
01m 15s
01m 30s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecAMellum2.1 ThinkingBSpark X2.6 4B
Speed
90 tok/s
136 tok/s
Machine
Apple M5 Pro, 48 GB
RTX 5090, 32 GB
Memory at 32K
12.9 GB
9.4 GB (better)
Context
128K
605K (better)
Cost per run
$2.46 est.
$1.61 est. (better)
Cost per case
$0.016 est.
$0.011 est. (better)
Time per case
1m 56s
1m 3s (better)
Quantization
Q8_0
BF16
Harness
llama.cpp
llama.cpp
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation