DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Spark X2.6 4B
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Spark X2.6 4B spends 1.3× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskADeepSeek V4.1 FlashBSpark X2.6 4B
Overall
643m 35s
151m 3s
Agents
464m 42s
141m 32s
Structured Extraction
862m 8s
1039.5s
Coding
514m 55s
41m 8s
Grounded Answers
762m 17s
1050.2s
Instruction Following
894m 24s
371m 29s
Business Logic
814m 1s
1036.3s
Security & permissions
693m 3s
3154.3s
Diagnosis & investigation
172m 8s
01m 30s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecADeepSeek V4.1 FlashBSpark X2.6 4B
Speed
30 tok/s
136 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
RTX 5090, 32 GB
Memory at 32K
—
9.4 GB
Context
1M (better)
605K
Cost per run
$0.39 (better)
$1.61 est.
Cost per case
$0.0026 (better)
$0.011 est.
Time per case
3m 35s
1m 3s (better)
Quantization
FP8
BF16
Harness
openrouter
llama.cpp
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation