DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Spark X2.6 4B
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Spark X2.6 4B spends 1.4× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskADeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BSpark X2.6 4B
Overall
5626.0s
151m 3s
Agents
5826.7s
141m 32s
Structured Extraction
8117.2s
1039.5s
Coding
4840.8s
41m 8s
Grounded Answers
7119.8s
1050.2s
Instruction Following
7625.6s
371m 29s
Business Logic
6726.6s
1036.3s
Security & permissions
4826.6s
3154.3s
Diagnosis & investigation
020.2s
01m 30s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecADeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BSpark X2.6 4B
Speed
243 tok/s
136 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
RTX 5090, 32 GB
Memory at 32K
—
9.4 GB
Context
1M (better)
605K
Cost per run
$0.75 (better)
$1.61 est.
Cost per case
$0.0049 (better)
$0.011 est.
Time per case
26.0s (better)
1m 3s
Quantization
—
BF16
Harness
openrouter
llama.cpp
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation