Underdog Saluki 27B vs Claude Haiku 5.5
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Underdog Saluki 27B spends 1.9× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskAUnderdog Saluki 27BBClaude Haiku 5.5
Overall
335m 15s
7025.5s
Agents
409m 2s
6139.5s
Structured Extraction
433m 17s
9013.5s
Coding
166m 54s
8630.6s
Grounded Answers
433m 22s
7613.9s
Instruction Following
466m 5s
9431.5s
Business Logic
333m 55s
6726.0s
Security & permissions
433m 47s
6723.4s
Diagnosis & investigation
06m 39s
1725.5s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecAUnderdog Saluki 27BBClaude Haiku 5.5
Speed
23 tok/s
225 tok/s
Machine
Apple M5 Pro, 48 GB
Hosted
Memory at 32K
10.2 GB
—
Context
256K
1M (better)
Cost per run
Not measured
$0.42
Cost per case
Not measured
$0.0028
Time per case
5m 15s
25.5s (better)
Quantization
IQ2_XS
—
Harness
llama.cpp
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation