Spark X2.6 1.7B vs Claude Haiku 5.5
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. The time under each score is the average per test case, on the machine it ran on. Spark X2.6 1.7B spends 2.4× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskASpark X2.6 1.7BBClaude Haiku 5.5
Overall
41m 43s
7025.5s
Agents
02m 10s
6139.5s
Structured Extraction
01m 19s
9013.5s
Coding
01m 51s
8630.6s
Grounded Answers
056.4s
7613.9s
Instruction Following
242m 53s
9431.5s
Business Logic
01m 22s
6726.0s
Security & permissions
1059.4s
6723.4s
Diagnosis & investigation
03m 16s
1725.5s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecASpark X2.6 1.7BBClaude Haiku 5.5
Speed
106 tok/s
225 tok/s
Machine
Apple M5 Pro, 48 GB
Hosted
Memory at 32K
2.9 GB
—
Context
1M
1M
Cost per run
Not measured
$0.42
Cost per case
Not measured
$0.0028
Time per case
1m 43s
25.5s (better)
Quantization
Q8_0
—
Harness
llama.cpp
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation