Flint vs Claude Haiku 5.5

Overall
21
vs
Overall
70

Claude Haiku 5.5 is clearly better. It wins 83 of the 84 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Flint spends 3.2× as many thinking tokens per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
211m 17s
10.9K, 90% thinking3.9K, 78% thinking
7025.5s
Agents
1447.7s
4.8K, 85% thinking3.7K, 61% thinking
6139.5s
Structured Extraction
291m 17s
10.9K, 87% thinking2.6K, 83% thinking
9013.5s
Coding
141m 19s
12K, 98% thinking6.8K, 76% thinking
8630.6s
Grounded Answers
2957.7s
8.7K, 93% thinking2.2K, 78% thinking
7613.9s
Instruction Following
352m 28s
22.2K, 93% thinking4.3K, 82% thinking
9431.5s
Business Logic
101m 20s
11.7K, 78% thinking5.5K, 95% thinking
6726.0s
Security & permissions
3552.6s
7.1K, 90% thinking2.7K, 70% thinking
6723.4s
Diagnosis & investigation
057.0s
7.3K, 99% thinking2.3K, 50% thinking
1725.5s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
149 tok/s
225 tok/s (better)
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
256K
1M (better)
Cost per run
Not measured
$0.42
Cost per case
Not measured
$0.0028
Time per case
1m 17s
25.5s (better)
Quantization
BF16
—
Harness
openrouter
openrouter

The race

No lead changes

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

FlintClaude Haiku 5.5
0255075100501001502170

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

1 won by Flint83 won by Claude Haiku 5.569 tied