Apodex 1.1 Mini (free) vs Claude Haiku 5.5

Overall
25
vs
Overall
70

Claude Haiku 5.5 is clearly better. It wins 82 of the 84 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Apodex 1.1 Mini (free) spends 2.1× as many thinking tokens per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
2535.1s
8.5K, 75% thinking3.9K, 78% thinking
7025.5s
Agents
2639.4s
6.2K, 69% thinking3.7K, 61% thinking
6139.5s
Structured Extraction
5227.2s
7.7K, 68% thinking2.6K, 83% thinking
9013.5s
Coding
446.5s
12.1K, 94% thinking6.8K, 76% thinking
8630.6s
Grounded Answers
2926.0s
6.9K, 70% thinking2.2K, 78% thinking
7613.9s
Instruction Following
3644.5s
11.4K, 79% thinking4.3K, 82% thinking
9431.5s
Business Logic
1435.4s
10K, 56% thinking5.5K, 95% thinking
6726.0s
Security & permissions
4027.3s
5.8K, 76% thinking2.7K, 70% thinking
6723.4s
Diagnosis & investigation
034.6s
5.1K, 84% thinking2.3K, 50% thinking
1725.5s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
278 tok/s (better)
225 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
256K
1M (better)
Cost per run
Not measured
$0.42
Cost per case
Not measured
$0.0028
Time per case
35.1s
25.5s (better)
Quantization
BF16
—
Harness
openrouter
openrouter

The race

No lead changes

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

Apodex 1.1 Mini (free)Claude Haiku 5.5
025507510050100150Perfect run2570

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

2 won by Apodex 1.1 Mini (free)82 won by Claude Haiku 5.569 tied