MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Flash
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. MiMo-V2.6-Pro spends 1.6× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskAMiMo-V2.6-ProBQwen3.8 Flash
Overall
482m 13s
3258.5s
Agents
474m 48s
491m 25s
Structured Extraction
601m 26s
3336.9s
Coding
242m 58s
471m 21s
Grounded Answers
621m 9s
2641.4s
Instruction Following
591m 23s
371m 4s
Business Logic
571m 52s
1746.8s
Security & permissions
711m 41s
5054.1s
Diagnosis & investigation
02m 54s
058.4s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecAMiMo-V2.6-ProBQwen3.8 Flash
Speed
55 tok/s
77 tok/s (better)
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1.1M (better)
1M
Cost per run
$1.80
$0.46 (better)
Cost per case
$0.012
$0.003 (better)
Time per case
2m 13s
58.5s (better)
Quantization
BF16
—
Harness
openrouter
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation