MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Mistral Large 4
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Both models spend about the same on thinking per test case.
TaskAMiMo-V2.6-FlashBMistral Large 4
Overall
451m 21s
281m 56s
Agents
381m 19s
1126.1s
Structured Extraction
6238.0s
153.78s
Coding
242m 40s
332m 48s
Grounded Answers
6242.1s
382m 45s
Instruction Following
641m 2s
693m 47s
Business Logic
4356.4s
242m 40s
Security & permissions
662m 6s
331m 9s
Diagnosis & investigation
01m 33s
01m 19s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecAMiMo-V2.6-FlashBMistral Large 4
Speed
66 tok/s (better)
56 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1.1M (better)
512K
Cost per run
$0.33 (better)
$2.67
Cost per case
$0.0021 (better)
$0.017
Time per case
1m 21s (better)
1m 56s
Quantization
BF16
—
Harness
openrouter
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation