MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. MiMo-V2.6-Pro spends 1.3× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskAMiMo-V2.6-FlashBMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Overall
451m 21s
482m 13s
Agents
381m 19s
474m 48s
Structured Extraction
6238.0s
601m 26s
Coding
242m 40s
242m 58s
Grounded Answers
6242.1s
621m 9s
Instruction Following
641m 2s
591m 23s
Business Logic
4356.4s
571m 52s
Security & permissions
662m 6s
711m 41s
Diagnosis & investigation
01m 33s
02m 54s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecAMiMo-V2.6-FlashBMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Speed
66 tok/s (better)
55 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1.1M
1.1M
Cost per run
$0.33 (better)
$1.80
Cost per case
$0.0021 (better)
$0.012
Time per case
1m 21s (better)
2m 13s
Quantization
BF16
BF16
Harness
openrouter
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation