Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27B
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Both models spend about the same on thinking per test case.
TaskALing 3.1 FlashBQwen3.8 27B
Overall
451m 16s
4833.3s
Agents
4155.9s
5736.6s
Structured Extraction
711m 11s
7320.6s
Coding
241m 42s
3753.0s
Grounded Answers
5258.9s
6131.6s
Instruction Following
761m 55s
6733.6s
Business Logic
381m 22s
3632.9s
Security & permissions
5456.1s
5122.6s
Diagnosis & investigation
042.1s
040.0s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecALing 3.1 FlashBQwen3.8 27B
Speed
112 tok/s
196 tok/s (better)
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
256K
256K
Cost per run
Not measured
$1.28
Cost per case
Not measured
$0.0083
Time per case
1m 16s
33.3s (better)
Quantization
—
FP8
Harness
openrouter
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation