LFM2.5 24B A2B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. LFM2.5 24B A2B spends 5.0× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskALFM2.5 24B A2BBMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Overall
71m 53s
3521.3s
Agents
123m 49s
3637.0s
Structured Extraction
1054.9s
487.96s
Coding
11m 15s
5840.6s
Grounded Answers
557.8s
339.75s
Instruction Following
162m 44s
5314.7s
Business Logic
51m 2s
2425.9s
Security & permissions
101m 52s
3012.7s
Diagnosis & investigation
04m 12s
022.8s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecALFM2.5 24B A2BBMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Speed
82 tok/s
135 tok/s
Machine
Apple M5 Pro, 48 GB
Hosted
Memory at 32K
25.0 GB
—
Context
128K
1M (better)
Cost per run
Not measured
Not measured
Cost per case
Not measured
Not measured
Time per case
1m 53s
21.3s (better)
Quantization
Q8_0
—
Harness
llama.cpp
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation