GPT-6 Luna vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. MiMo-V2.6-Flash spends 2.8× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskAGPT-6 LunaBMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Overall
6149.1s
451m 21s
Agents
561m 18s
381m 19s
Structured Extraction
9514.5s
6238.0s
Coding
732m 18s
242m 40s
Grounded Answers
6715.6s
6242.1s
Instruction Following
8432.3s
641m 2s
Business Logic
3743.1s
4356.4s
Security & permissions
6224.5s
662m 6s
Diagnosis & investigation
1737.7s
01m 33s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecAGPT-6 LunaBMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Speed
90 tok/s (better)
66 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1.1M
1.1M
Cost per run
$0.10 (better)
$0.33
Cost per case
$0.00067 (better)
$0.0021
Time per case
49.1s (better)
1m 21s
Quantization
—
BF16
Harness
openrouter
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation