Flint vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Flint spends 3.0× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskAFlintBQwen3.8 Flash Next
Overall
211m 17s
421m 15s
Agents
1447.7s
522m 4s
Structured Extraction
291m 17s
5042.2s
Coding
141m 19s
521m 36s
Grounded Answers
2957.7s
5147.0s
Instruction Following
352m 28s
621m 30s
Business Logic
101m 20s
251m 0s
Security & permissions
3552.6s
451m 8s
Diagnosis & investigation
057.0s
01m 15s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecAFlintBQwen3.8 Flash Next
Speed
149 tok/s (better)
68 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
256K
1M (better)
Cost per run
Not measured
$0.46
Cost per case
Not measured
$0.003
Time per case
1m 17s
1m 15s (better)
Quantization
BF16
—
Harness
openrouter
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation