DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Underdog Saluki 27B
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Both models spend about the same on thinking per test case.
TaskADeepSeek V4.1 FlashBUnderdog Saluki 27B
Overall
643m 35s
335m 15s
Agents
464m 42s
409m 2s
Structured Extraction
862m 8s
433m 17s
Coding
514m 55s
166m 54s
Grounded Answers
762m 17s
433m 22s
Instruction Following
894m 24s
466m 5s
Business Logic
814m 1s
333m 55s
Security & permissions
693m 3s
433m 47s
Diagnosis & investigation
172m 8s
06m 39s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecADeepSeek V4.1 FlashBUnderdog Saluki 27B
Speed
30 tok/s
23 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Apple M5 Pro, 48 GB
Memory at 32K
—
10.2 GB
Context
1M (better)
256K
Cost per run
$0.39
Not measured
Cost per case
$0.0026
Not measured
Time per case
3m 35s (better)
5m 15s
Quantization
FP8
IQ2_XS
Harness
openrouter
llama.cpp
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation