DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Both models spend about the same on thinking per test case.
TaskADeepSeek V4.1 FlashBMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Overall
643m 35s
482m 13s
Agents
464m 42s
474m 48s
Structured Extraction
862m 8s
601m 26s
Coding
514m 55s
242m 58s
Grounded Answers
762m 17s
621m 9s
Instruction Following
894m 24s
591m 23s
Business Logic
814m 1s
571m 52s
Security & permissions
693m 3s
711m 41s
Diagnosis & investigation
172m 8s
02m 54s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecADeepSeek V4.1 FlashBMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Speed
30 tok/s
55 tok/s (better)
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1M
1.1M (better)
Cost per run
$0.39 (better)
$1.80
Cost per case
$0.0026 (better)
$0.012
Time per case
3m 35s
2m 13s (better)
Quantization
FP8
BF16
Harness
openrouter
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation