DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Mellum2.1 Thinking
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Mellum2.1 Thinking spends 1.2× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskADeepSeek V4.1 FlashBMellum2.1 Thinking
Overall
643m 35s
91m 56s
Agents
464m 42s
92m 3s
Structured Extraction
862m 8s
51m 36s
Coding
514m 55s
52m 11s
Grounded Answers
762m 17s
131m 24s
Instruction Following
894m 24s
283m 10s
Business Logic
814m 1s
01m 39s
Security & permissions
693m 3s
81m 40s
Diagnosis & investigation
172m 8s
01m 15s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecADeepSeek V4.1 FlashBMellum2.1 Thinking
Speed
30 tok/s
90 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Apple M5 Pro, 48 GB
Memory at 32K
—
12.9 GB
Context
1M (better)
128K
Cost per run
$0.39 (better)
$2.46 est.
Cost per case
$0.0026 (better)
$0.016 est.
Time per case
3m 35s
1m 56s (better)
Quantization
FP8
Q8_0
Harness
openrouter
llama.cpp
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation