DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Both models spend about the same on thinking per test case.
TaskADeepSeek V4.1 FlashBLing 3.1 Flash
Overall
643m 35s
451m 16s
Agents
464m 42s
4155.9s
Structured Extraction
862m 8s
711m 11s
Coding
514m 55s
241m 42s
Grounded Answers
762m 17s
5258.9s
Instruction Following
894m 24s
761m 55s
Business Logic
814m 1s
381m 22s
Security & permissions
693m 3s
5456.1s
Diagnosis & investigation
172m 8s
042.1s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecADeepSeek V4.1 FlashBLing 3.1 Flash
Speed
30 tok/s
112 tok/s (better)
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1M (better)
256K
Cost per run
$0.39
Not measured
Cost per case
$0.0026
Not measured
Time per case
3m 35s
1m 16s (better)
Quantization
FP8
—
Harness
openrouter
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation