DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Both models spend about the same on thinking per test case.
TaskADeepSeek V4.1 FlashBDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Overall
643m 35s
5626.0s
Agents
464m 42s
5826.7s
Structured Extraction
862m 8s
8117.2s
Coding
514m 55s
4840.8s
Grounded Answers
762m 17s
7119.8s
Instruction Following
894m 24s
7625.6s
Business Logic
814m 1s
6726.6s
Security & permissions
693m 3s
4826.6s
Diagnosis & investigation
172m 8s
020.2s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecADeepSeek V4.1 FlashBDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Speed
30 tok/s
243 tok/s (better)
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1M
1M
Cost per run
$0.39 (better)
$0.75
Cost per case
$0.0026 (better)
$0.0049
Time per case
3m 35s
26.0s (better)
Quantization
FP8
—
Harness
openrouter
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation