DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 spends 1.2× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskADeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Overall
5626.0s
451m 21s
Agents
5826.7s
381m 19s
Structured Extraction
8117.2s
6238.0s
Coding
4840.8s
242m 40s
Grounded Answers
7119.8s
6242.1s
Instruction Following
7625.6s
641m 2s
Business Logic
6726.6s
4356.4s
Security & permissions
4826.6s
662m 6s
Diagnosis & investigation
020.2s
01m 33s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecADeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017BMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Speed
243 tok/s (better)
66 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1M
1.1M (better)
Cost per run
$0.75
$0.33 (better)
Cost per case
$0.0049
$0.0021 (better)
Time per case
26.0s (better)
1m 21s
Quantization
—
BF16
Harness
openrouter
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation