Clover 35B A3B Preview vs Underdog Saluki 27B
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. The time under each score is the average per test case, on the machine it ran on. Clover 35B A3B Preview spends 1.4× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskAClover 35B A3B PreviewBUnderdog Saluki 27B
Overall
3035.1s
335m 15s
Agents
2036.8s
409m 2s
Structured Extraction
4327.5s
433m 17s
Coding
101m 5s
166m 54s
Grounded Answers
4821.0s
433m 22s
Instruction Following
5332.8s
466m 5s
Business Logic
1936.1s
333m 55s
Security & permissions
4725.6s
433m 47s
Diagnosis & investigation
037.0s
06m 39s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecAClover 35B A3B PreviewBUnderdog Saluki 27B
Speed
252 tok/s
23 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Apple M5 Pro, 48 GB
Memory at 32K
—
10.2 GB
Context
—
256K
Cost per run
Not measured
Not measured
Cost per case
Not measured
Not measured
Time per case
35.1s (better)
5m 15s
Quantization
—
IQ2_XS
Harness
custom
llama.cpp
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation