Clover 35B A3B Preview vs Underdog Saluki 27B

Overall
30
vs
Overall
33

Underdog Saluki 27B is clearly better. It wins 30 of the 46 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. The time under each score is the average per test case, on the machine it ran on. Clover 35B A3B Preview spends 1.4× as many thinking tokens per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
3035.1s
8.4K, 95% thinking6.9K, 84% thinking
335m 15s
Agents
2036.8s
9.6K, 91% thinking11.8K, 97% thinking
409m 2s
Structured Extraction
4327.5s
7.2K, 97% thinking4.4K, 92% thinking
433m 17s
Coding
101m 5s
12.2K, 100% thinking9.2K, 49% thinking
166m 54s
Grounded Answers
4821.0s
5.4K, 94% thinking4.5K, 92% thinking
433m 22s
Instruction Following
5332.8s
9.2K, 95% thinking8K, 94% thinking
466m 5s
Business Logic
1936.1s
9.8K, 99% thinking5.2K, 81% thinking
333m 55s
Security & permissions
4725.6s
5.8K, 92% thinking4.9K, 91% thinking
433m 47s
Diagnosis & investigation
037.0s
7K, 82% thinking8.7K, 94% thinking
06m 39s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
252 tok/s
23 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Apple M5 Pro, 48 GB
Memory at 32K
—
10.2 GB
Context
—
256K
Cost per run
Not measured
Not measured
Cost per case
Not measured
Not measured
Time per case
35.1s (better)
5m 15s
Quantization
—
IQ2_XS
Harness
custom
llama.cpp

The race

No lead changes

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

Clover 35B A3B PreviewUnderdog Saluki 27B
0255075100501001503033

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

16 won by Clover 35B A3B Preview30 won by Underdog Saluki 27B107 tied