Clover 35B A3B Preview vs Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

Overall
30
vs
Overall
66

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is clearly better. It wins 68 of the 70 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. The time under each score is the average per test case, on the machine it ran on. Both models spend about the same on thinking per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
3035.1s
8.4K, 95% thinking8.7K, 91% thinking
661m 42s
Agents
2036.8s
9.6K, 91% thinking14.7K, 88% thinking
573m 16s
Structured Extraction
4327.5s
7.2K, 97% thinking4.2K, 91% thinking
9037.9s
Coding
101m 5s
12.2K, 100% thinking10.8K, 95% thinking
482m 1s
Grounded Answers
4821.0s
5.4K, 94% thinking6.1K, 91% thinking
811m 1s
Instruction Following
5332.8s
9.2K, 95% thinking8.7K, 91% thinking
841m 18s
Business Logic
1936.1s
9.8K, 99% thinking6K, 95% thinking
761m 7s
Security & permissions
4725.6s
5.8K, 92% thinking8.2K, 87% thinking
761m 59s
Diagnosis & investigation
037.0s
7K, 82% thinking17.2K, 90% thinking
173m 34s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
252 tok/s (better)
107 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
—
1M
Cost per run
Not measured
$0.41
Cost per case
Not measured
$0.0027
Time per case
35.1s (better)
1m 42s
Quantization
—
—
Harness
custom
openrouter

The race

No lead changes

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

Clover 35B A3B PreviewMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor
0255075100501001503066

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

2 won by Clover 35B A3B Preview68 won by Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor83 tied