Clover 35B A3B Preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. The time under each score is the average per test case, on the machine it ran on. Clover 35B A3B Preview spends 1.5× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskAClover 35B A3B PreviewBMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Overall
3035.1s
482m 13s
Agents
2036.8s
474m 48s
Structured Extraction
4327.5s
601m 26s
Coding
101m 5s
242m 58s
Grounded Answers
4821.0s
621m 9s
Instruction Following
5332.8s
591m 23s
Business Logic
1936.1s
571m 52s
Security & permissions
4725.6s
711m 41s
Diagnosis & investigation
037.0s
02m 54s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecAClover 35B A3B PreviewBMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Speed
252 tok/s (better)
55 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
—
1.1M
Cost per run
Not measured
$1.80
Cost per case
Not measured
$0.012
Time per case
35.1s (better)
2m 13s
Quantization
—
BF16
Harness
custom
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation