Clover 35B A3B Preview vs GPT-6 Luna

Overall
30
vs
Overall
61

GPT-6 Luna is clearly better. It wins 63 of the 66 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. The time under each score is the average per test case, on the machine it ran on. Clover 35B A3B Preview spends 5.9× as many thinking tokens per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
3035.1s
8.4K, 95% thinking1.9K, 73% thinking
6149.1s
Agents
2036.8s
9.6K, 91% thinking1.3K, 67% thinking
561m 18s
Structured Extraction
4327.5s
7.2K, 97% thinking999, 72% thinking
9514.5s
Coding
101m 5s
12.2K, 100% thinking3.6K, 60% thinking
732m 18s
Grounded Answers
4821.0s
5.4K, 94% thinking1.1K, 72% thinking
6715.6s
Instruction Following
5332.8s
9.2K, 95% thinking2K, 74% thinking
8432.3s
Business Logic
1936.1s
9.8K, 99% thinking3.2K, 93% thinking
3743.1s
Security & permissions
4725.6s
5.8K, 92% thinking1K, 68% thinking
6224.5s
Diagnosis & investigation
037.0s
7K, 82% thinking1.1K, 68% thinking
1737.7s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
252 tok/s (better)
90 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
—
1.1M
Cost per run
Not measured
$0.10
Cost per case
Not measured
$0.00067
Time per case
35.1s (better)
49.1s
Quantization
—
—
Harness
custom
openrouter

The race

No lead changes

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

Clover 35B A3B PreviewGPT-6 Luna
0255075100501001503061

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

3 won by Clover 35B A3B Preview63 won by GPT-6 Luna87 tied