Clover 35B A3B Preview vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Overall
30
vs
Overall
64

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is clearly better. It wins 66 of the 70 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. The time under each score is the average per test case, on the machine it ran on. Clover 35B A3B Preview spends 1.5× as many thinking tokens per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
3035.1s
8.4K, 95% thinking6K, 91% thinking
643m 35s
Agents
2036.8s
9.6K, 91% thinking6.1K, 82% thinking
464m 42s
Structured Extraction
4327.5s
7.2K, 97% thinking4.4K, 94% thinking
862m 8s
Coding
101m 5s
12.2K, 100% thinking9.7K, 95% thinking
514m 55s
Grounded Answers
4821.0s
5.4K, 94% thinking3.9K, 90% thinking
762m 17s
Instruction Following
5332.8s
9.2K, 95% thinking7.5K, 94% thinking
894m 24s
Business Logic
1936.1s
9.8K, 99% thinking7K, 97% thinking
814m 1s
Security & permissions
4725.6s
5.8K, 92% thinking4.4K, 81% thinking
693m 3s
Diagnosis & investigation
037.0s
7K, 82% thinking3.2K, 67% thinking
172m 8s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
252 tok/s (better)
30 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
—
1M
Cost per run
Not measured
$0.39
Cost per case
Not measured
$0.0026
Time per case
35.1s (better)
3m 35s
Quantization
—
FP8
Harness
custom
openrouter

The race

No lead changes

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

Clover 35B A3B PreviewDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
0255075100501001503064

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

4 won by Clover 35B A3B Preview66 won by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash83 tied