Claude Haiku 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. MiMo-V2.6-Pro spends 1.7× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskAClaude Haiku 5.5BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Overall
7025.5s
482m 13s
Agents
6139.5s
474m 48s
Structured Extraction
9013.5s
601m 26s
Coding
8630.6s
242m 58s
Grounded Answers
7613.9s
621m 9s
Instruction Following
9431.5s
591m 23s
Business Logic
6726.0s
571m 52s
Security & permissions
6723.4s
711m 41s
Diagnosis & investigation
1725.5s
02m 54s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecAClaude Haiku 5.5BMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Speed
225 tok/s (better)
55 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1M
1.1M (better)
Cost per run
$0.42 (better)
$1.80
Cost per case
$0.0028 (better)
$0.012
Time per case
25.5s (better)
2m 13s
Quantization
—
BF16
Harness
openrouter
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation