Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Flint

Overall
70
vs
Overall
21

Claude Haiku 5.5 is clearly better. It wins 83 of the 84 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Flint spends 3.2× as many thinking tokens per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
7025.5s
3.9K, 78% thinking10.9K, 90% thinking
211m 17s
Agents
6139.5s
3.7K, 61% thinking4.8K, 85% thinking
1447.7s
Structured Extraction
9013.5s
2.6K, 83% thinking10.9K, 87% thinking
291m 17s
Coding
8630.6s
6.8K, 76% thinking12K, 98% thinking
141m 19s
Grounded Answers
7613.9s
2.2K, 78% thinking8.7K, 93% thinking
2957.7s
Instruction Following
9431.5s
4.3K, 82% thinking22.2K, 93% thinking
352m 28s
Business Logic
6726.0s
5.5K, 95% thinking11.7K, 78% thinking
101m 20s
Security & permissions
6723.4s
2.7K, 70% thinking7.1K, 90% thinking
3552.6s
Diagnosis & investigation
1725.5s
2.3K, 50% thinking7.3K, 99% thinking
057.0s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
225 tok/s (better)
149 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1M (better)
256K
Cost per run
$0.42
Not measured
Cost per case
$0.0028
Not measured
Time per case
25.5s (better)
1m 17s
Quantization
—
BF16
Harness
openrouter
openrouter

The race

No lead changes

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

Claude Haiku 5.5Flint
0255075100501001507021

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

83 won by Claude Haiku 5.51 won by Flint69 tied