Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. MiMo-V2.6-Pro spends 1.5× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskABeam 1.0 501B A23BBMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Overall
5717.2s
482m 13s
Agents
5521.8s
474m 48s
Structured Extraction
819.98s
601m 26s
Coding
4819.9s
242m 58s
Grounded Answers
6911.6s
621m 9s
Instruction Following
7820.9s
591m 23s
Business Logic
5714.0s
571m 52s
Security & permissions
5120.6s
711m 41s
Diagnosis & investigation
1724.3s
02m 54s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecABeam 1.0 501B A23BBMiMo-V2.6-Pro
Speed
274 tok/s (better)
55 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1M
1.1M (better)
Cost per run
$0.83 (better)
$1.80
Cost per case
$0.0054 (better)
$0.012
Time per case
17.2s (better)
2m 13s
Quantization
FP8
BF16
Harness
openrouter
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation