Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Overall
57
vs
Overall
45

Too close to call. Beam 1.0 501B A23B wins 32 of the 53 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Both models spend about the same on thinking per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
5717.2s
4K, 87% thinking4.2K, 92% thinking
451m 21s
Agents
5521.8s
4.8K, 90% thinking2.2K, 86% thinking
381m 19s
Structured Extraction
819.98s
3.4K, 91% thinking2.6K, 91% thinking
6238.0s
Coding
4819.9s
4.5K, 70% thinking9.9K, 97% thinking
242m 40s
Grounded Answers
6911.6s
2.7K, 88% thinking2.6K, 89% thinking
6242.1s
Instruction Following
7820.9s
5.6K, 90% thinking4.8K, 90% thinking
641m 2s
Business Logic
5714.0s
4.2K, 95% thinking4.4K, 96% thinking
4356.4s
Security & permissions
5120.6s
3.2K, 88% thinking3.8K, 88% thinking
662m 6s
Diagnosis & investigation
1724.3s
3.1K, 90% thinking1.5K, 83% thinking
01m 33s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
274 tok/s (better)
66 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1M
1.1M (better)
Cost per run
$0.83
$0.33 (better)
Cost per case
$0.0054
$0.0021 (better)
Time per case
17.2s (better)
1m 21s
Quantization
FP8
BF16
Harness
openrouter
openrouter

The race

1 lead change

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

Beam 1.0 501B A23BMiMo-V2.6-Flash
025507510050100150Perfect run5745

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

32 won by Beam 1.0 501B A23B21 won by MiMo-V2.6-Flash100 tied