Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Both models spend about the same on thinking per test case.
TaskABeam 1.0 501B A23BBMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Overall
5717.2s
451m 21s
Agents
5521.8s
381m 19s
Structured Extraction
819.98s
6238.0s
Coding
4819.9s
242m 40s
Grounded Answers
6911.6s
6242.1s
Instruction Following
7820.9s
641m 2s
Business Logic
5714.0s
4356.4s
Security & permissions
5120.6s
662m 6s
Diagnosis & investigation
1724.3s
01m 33s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecABeam 1.0 501B A23BBMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Speed
274 tok/s (better)
66 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1M
1.1M (better)
Cost per run
$0.83
$0.33 (better)
Cost per case
$0.0054
$0.0021 (better)
Time per case
17.2s (better)
1m 21s
Quantization
FP8
BF16
Harness
openrouter
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation