Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Ling 3.1 Flash spends 1.6× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskABeam 1.0 501B A23BBLing 3.1 Flash
Overall
5717.2s
451m 16s
Agents
5521.8s
4155.9s
Structured Extraction
819.98s
711m 11s
Coding
4819.9s
241m 42s
Grounded Answers
6911.6s
5258.9s
Instruction Following
7820.9s
761m 55s
Business Logic
5714.0s
381m 22s
Security & permissions
5120.6s
5456.1s
Diagnosis & investigation
1724.3s
042.1s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecABeam 1.0 501B A23BBLing 3.1 Flash
Speed
274 tok/s (better)
112 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1M (better)
256K
Cost per run
$0.83
Not measured
Cost per case
$0.0054
Not measured
Time per case
17.2s (better)
1m 16s
Quantization
FP8
—
Harness
openrouter
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation