Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Flint
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Flint spends 2.8× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskABeam 1.0 501B A23BBFlint
Overall
5717.2s
211m 17s
Agents
5521.8s
1447.7s
Structured Extraction
819.98s
291m 17s
Coding
4819.9s
141m 19s
Grounded Answers
6911.6s
2957.7s
Instruction Following
7820.9s
352m 28s
Business Logic
5714.0s
101m 20s
Security & permissions
5120.6s
3552.6s
Diagnosis & investigation
1724.3s
057.0s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecABeam 1.0 501B A23BBFlint
Speed
274 tok/s (better)
149 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1M (better)
256K
Cost per run
$0.83
Not measured
Cost per case
$0.0054
Not measured
Time per case
17.2s (better)
1m 17s
Quantization
FP8
BF16
Harness
openrouter
openrouter
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation