Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Flint

Overall
57
vs
Overall
21

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is clearly better. It wins 64 of the 68 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Flint spends 2.8× as many thinking tokens per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
5717.2s
4K, 87% thinking10.9K, 90% thinking
211m 17s
Agents
5521.8s
4.8K, 90% thinking4.8K, 85% thinking
1447.7s
Structured Extraction
819.98s
3.4K, 91% thinking10.9K, 87% thinking
291m 17s
Coding
4819.9s
4.5K, 70% thinking12K, 98% thinking
141m 19s
Grounded Answers
6911.6s
2.7K, 88% thinking8.7K, 93% thinking
2957.7s
Instruction Following
7820.9s
5.6K, 90% thinking22.2K, 93% thinking
352m 28s
Business Logic
5714.0s
4.2K, 95% thinking11.7K, 78% thinking
101m 20s
Security & permissions
5120.6s
3.2K, 88% thinking7.1K, 90% thinking
3552.6s
Diagnosis & investigation
1724.3s
3.1K, 90% thinking7.3K, 99% thinking
057.0s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
274 tok/s (better)
149 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1M (better)
256K
Cost per run
$0.83
Not measured
Cost per case
$0.0054
Not measured
Time per case
17.2s (better)
1m 17s
Quantization
FP8
BF16
Harness
openrouter
openrouter

The race

No lead changes

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

Beam 1.0 501B A23BFlint
0255075100501001505721

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

64 won by Beam 1.0 501B A23B4 won by Flint85 tied