Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Clover 35B A3B Preview

Overall
57
vs
Overall
30

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is clearly better. It wins 57 of the 69 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. The time under each score is the average per test case, on the machine it ran on. Clover 35B A3B Preview spends 2.3× as many thinking tokens per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
5717.2s
4K, 87% thinking8.4K, 95% thinking
3035.1s
Agents
5521.8s
4.8K, 90% thinking9.6K, 91% thinking
2036.8s
Structured Extraction
819.98s
3.4K, 91% thinking7.2K, 97% thinking
4327.5s
Coding
4819.9s
4.5K, 70% thinking12.2K, 100% thinking
101m 5s
Grounded Answers
6911.6s
2.7K, 88% thinking5.4K, 94% thinking
4821.0s
Instruction Following
7820.9s
5.6K, 90% thinking9.2K, 95% thinking
5332.8s
Business Logic
5714.0s
4.2K, 95% thinking9.8K, 99% thinking
1936.1s
Security & permissions
5120.6s
3.2K, 88% thinking5.8K, 92% thinking
4725.6s
Diagnosis & investigation
1724.3s
3.1K, 90% thinking7K, 82% thinking
037.0s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
274 tok/s (better)
252 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1M
—
Cost per run
$0.83
Not measured
Cost per case
$0.0054
Not measured
Time per case
17.2s (better)
35.1s
Quantization
FP8
—
Harness
openrouter
custom

The race

No lead changes

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

Beam 1.0 501B A23BClover 35B A3B Preview
0255075100501001505730

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

57 won by Beam 1.0 501B A23B12 won by Clover 35B A3B Preview84 tied