Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Clover 35B A3B Preview
Task by task
A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. The time under each score is the average per test case, on the machine it ran on. Clover 35B A3B Preview spends 2.3× as many thinking tokens per test case.
TaskABeam 1.0 501B A23BBClover 35B A3B Preview
Overall
5717.2s
3035.1s
Agents
5521.8s
2036.8s
Structured Extraction
819.98s
4327.5s
Coding
4819.9s
101m 5s
Grounded Answers
6911.6s
4821.0s
Instruction Following
7820.9s
5332.8s
Business Logic
5714.0s
1936.1s
Security & permissions
5120.6s
4725.6s
Diagnosis & investigation
1724.3s
037.0s
What you'd run
The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.
SpecABeam 1.0 501B A23BBClover 35B A3B Preview
Speed
274 tok/s (better)
252 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
1M
—
Cost per run
$0.83
Not measured
Cost per case
$0.0054
Not measured
Time per case
17.2s (better)
35.1s
Quantization
FP8
—
Harness
openrouter
custom
The race
Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.
Every test case
Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.
Agents
Structured Extraction
Coding
Grounded Answers
Instruction Following
Business Logic
Security & permissions
Diagnosis & investigation