Apodex 1.1 Mini (free) vs Underdog Saluki 27B

Overall
25
vs
Overall
33

Underdog Saluki 27B is clearly better. It wins 32 of the 43 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Both models spend about the same on thinking per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
2535.1s
8.5K, 75% thinking6.9K, 84% thinking
335m 15s
Agents
2639.4s
6.2K, 69% thinking11.8K, 97% thinking
409m 2s
Structured Extraction
5227.2s
7.7K, 68% thinking4.4K, 92% thinking
433m 17s
Coding
446.5s
12.1K, 94% thinking9.2K, 49% thinking
166m 54s
Grounded Answers
2926.0s
6.9K, 70% thinking4.5K, 92% thinking
433m 22s
Instruction Following
3644.5s
11.4K, 79% thinking8K, 94% thinking
466m 5s
Business Logic
1435.4s
10K, 56% thinking5.2K, 81% thinking
333m 55s
Security & permissions
4027.3s
5.8K, 76% thinking4.9K, 91% thinking
433m 47s
Diagnosis & investigation
034.6s
5.1K, 84% thinking8.7K, 94% thinking
06m 39s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
278 tok/s
23 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Apple M5 Pro, 48 GB
Memory at 32K
—
10.2 GB
Context
256K
256K
Cost per run
Not measured
Not measured
Cost per case
Not measured
Not measured
Time per case
35.1s (better)
5m 15s
Quantization
BF16
IQ2_XS
Harness
openrouter
llama.cpp

The race

4 lead changes

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

Apodex 1.1 Mini (free)Underdog Saluki 27B
025507510050100150Perfect run2533

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

11 won by Apodex 1.1 Mini (free)32 won by Underdog Saluki 27B110 tied