Apodex 1.1 Mini (free) vs Qwen3.8 27B

Overall
25
vs
Overall
48

Qwen3.8 27B is clearly better. It wins 57 of the 68 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Apodex 1.1 Mini (free) spends 1.2× as many thinking tokens per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
2535.1s
8.5K, 75% thinking5.9K, 91% thinking
4833.3s
Agents
2639.4s
6.2K, 69% thinking5.2K, 78% thinking
5736.6s
Structured Extraction
5227.2s
7.7K, 68% thinking4.6K, 92% thinking
7320.6s
Coding
446.5s
12.1K, 94% thinking9.3K, 94% thinking
3753.0s
Grounded Answers
2926.0s
6.9K, 70% thinking4.2K, 91% thinking
6131.6s
Instruction Following
3644.5s
11.4K, 79% thinking6.9K, 93% thinking
6733.6s
Business Logic
1435.4s
10K, 56% thinking7.6K, 98% thinking
3632.9s
Security & permissions
4027.3s
5.8K, 76% thinking3.7K, 85% thinking
5122.6s
Diagnosis & investigation
034.6s
5.1K, 84% thinking5.9K, 85% thinking
040.0s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
278 tok/s (better)
196 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
256K
256K
Cost per run
Not measured
$1.28
Cost per case
Not measured
$0.0083
Time per case
35.1s
33.3s (better)
Quantization
BF16
FP8
Harness
openrouter
openrouter

The race

No lead changes

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

Apodex 1.1 Mini (free)Qwen3.8 27B
025507510050100150Perfect run2548

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

11 won by Apodex 1.1 Mini (free)57 won by Qwen3.8 27B85 tied