[mle]/DaBench

Apodex 1.1 Mini (free) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Side A
Model page
Side B
Model page
Overall
25
vs
Overall
45

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is clearly better. It wins 44 of the 49 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Apodex 1.1 Mini (free) spends 1.6× as many thinking tokens per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
2535.1s
8.5K, 75% thinking4.2K, 92% thinking
451m 21s
Agents
2639.4s
6.2K, 69% thinking2.2K, 86% thinking
381m 19s
Structured Extraction
5227.2s
7.7K, 68% thinking2.6K, 91% thinking
6238.0s
Coding
446.5s
12.1K, 94% thinking9.9K, 97% thinking
242m 40s
Grounded Answers
2926.0s
6.9K, 70% thinking2.6K, 89% thinking
6242.1s
Instruction Following
3644.5s
11.4K, 79% thinking4.8K, 90% thinking
641m 2s
Business Logic
1435.4s
10K, 56% thinking4.4K, 96% thinking
4356.4s
Security & permissions
4027.3s
5.8K, 76% thinking3.8K, 88% thinking
662m 6s
Diagnosis & investigation
034.6s
5.1K, 84% thinking1.5K, 83% thinking
01m 33s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
278 tok/s (better)
66 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
256K
1.1M (better)
Cost per run
Not measured
$0.33
Cost per case
Not measured
$0.0021
Time per case
35.1s (better)
1m 21s
Quantization
BF16
BF16
Harness
openrouter
openrouter

The race

2 lead changes

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

Apodex 1.1 Mini (free)MiMo-V2.6-Flash
025507510050100150Perfect run2545

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

5 won by Apodex 1.1 Mini (free)44 won by MiMo-V2.6-Flash104 tied