Apodex 1.1 Mini (free) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Overall
25
vs
Overall
56

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is clearly better. It wins 67 of the 74 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Apodex 1.1 Mini (free) spends 1.3× as many thinking tokens per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
2535.1s
8.5K, 75% thinking5.3K, 91% thinking
5626.0s
Agents
2639.4s
6.2K, 69% thinking3.3K, 71% thinking
5826.7s
Structured Extraction
5227.2s
7.7K, 68% thinking4.2K, 93% thinking
8117.2s
Coding
446.5s
12.1K, 94% thinking9.4K, 95% thinking
4840.8s
Grounded Answers
2926.0s
6.9K, 70% thinking4.4K, 91% thinking
7119.8s
Instruction Following
3644.5s
11.4K, 79% thinking5.5K, 91% thinking
7625.6s
Business Logic
1435.4s
10K, 56% thinking6.6K, 97% thinking
6726.6s
Security & permissions
4027.3s
5.8K, 76% thinking4.7K, 87% thinking
4826.6s
Diagnosis & investigation
034.6s
5.1K, 84% thinking3.2K, 74% thinking
020.2s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
278 tok/s (better)
243 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
256K
1M (better)
Cost per run
Not measured
$0.75
Cost per case
Not measured
$0.0049
Time per case
35.1s
26.0s (better)
Quantization
BF16
—
Harness
openrouter
openrouter

The race

No lead changes

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

Apodex 1.1 Mini (free)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
025507510050100150Perfect run2556

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

7 won by Apodex 1.1 Mini (free)67 won by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 101779 tied