Apodex 1.1 Mini (free) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Overall
25
vs
Overall
64

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is clearly better. It wins 73 of the 76 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Apodex 1.1 Mini (free) spends 1.2× as many thinking tokens per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
2535.1s
8.5K, 75% thinking6K, 91% thinking
643m 35s
Agents
2639.4s
6.2K, 69% thinking6.1K, 82% thinking
464m 42s
Structured Extraction
5227.2s
7.7K, 68% thinking4.4K, 94% thinking
862m 8s
Coding
446.5s
12.1K, 94% thinking9.7K, 95% thinking
514m 55s
Grounded Answers
2926.0s
6.9K, 70% thinking3.9K, 90% thinking
762m 17s
Instruction Following
3644.5s
11.4K, 79% thinking7.5K, 94% thinking
894m 24s
Business Logic
1435.4s
10K, 56% thinking7K, 97% thinking
814m 1s
Security & permissions
4027.3s
5.8K, 76% thinking4.4K, 81% thinking
693m 3s
Diagnosis & investigation
034.6s
5.1K, 84% thinking3.2K, 67% thinking
172m 8s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
278 tok/s (better)
30 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
256K
1M (better)
Cost per run
Not measured
$0.39
Cost per case
Not measured
$0.0026
Time per case
35.1s (better)
3m 35s
Quantization
BF16
FP8
Harness
openrouter
openrouter

The race

No lead changes

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

Apodex 1.1 Mini (free)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
025507510050100150Perfect run2564

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

3 won by Apodex 1.1 Mini (free)73 won by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash77 tied