Apodex 1.1 Mini (free) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Overall
25
vs
Overall
57

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is clearly better. It wins 63 of the 69 test cases where they differ.

Learn to build evals like this in the AI Engineering Academy

Task by task

A score turns orange only when that model wins clearly more of the task's test cases. Under each score, the average time per test case on the machine it ran on. Apodex 1.1 Mini (free) spends 1.8× as many thinking tokens per test case.

Thinking tokensAnswer tokens
TaskAB
Overall
2535.1s
8.5K, 75% thinking4K, 87% thinking
5717.2s
Agents
2639.4s
6.2K, 69% thinking4.8K, 90% thinking
5521.8s
Structured Extraction
5227.2s
7.7K, 68% thinking3.4K, 91% thinking
819.98s
Coding
446.5s
12.1K, 94% thinking4.5K, 70% thinking
4819.9s
Grounded Answers
2926.0s
6.9K, 70% thinking2.7K, 88% thinking
6911.6s
Instruction Following
3644.5s
11.4K, 79% thinking5.6K, 90% thinking
7820.9s
Business Logic
1435.4s
10K, 56% thinking4.2K, 95% thinking
5714.0s
Security & permissions
4027.3s
5.8K, 76% thinking3.2K, 88% thinking
5120.6s
Diagnosis & investigation
034.6s
5.1K, 84% thinking3.1K, 90% thinking
1724.3s

What you'd run

The build behind each score. Orange marks the faster, smaller, cheaper or longer-context side.

SpecAB
Speed
278 tok/s (better)
274 tok/s
Machine
Hosted
Hosted
Memory at 32K
—
—
Context
256K
1M (better)
Cost per run
Not measured
$0.83
Cost per case
Not measured
$0.0054
Time per case
35.1s
17.2s (better)
Quantization
BF16
FP8
Harness
openrouter
openrouter

The race

No lead changes

Each model's running score as the test cases go by. The dashed line is a perfect run.

Apodex 1.1 Mini (free)Beam 1.0 501B A23B
025507510050100150Perfect run2557

Every test case

153 test cases

Each square is one test case, colored by the model that scored higher.

6 won by Apodex 1.1 Mini (free)63 won by Beam 1.0 501B A23B84 tied